Thursday, December 27, 2012
Do the Right Thing
The AMA is much like any appropriate acronym group, once a trade union but now way too white coat for that are now Lobbyists that protect their member's interests and in turn incomes. They have been quite successful at blocking Single Payer option to health care reform, they have ceilings and caps on medical schools and in turn licenses issued to limit Doctors, to event the types of individuals qualified and capable of providing care; their role seems basically ensure their Doctors keep their 1% status while bankrupting 60% of Americans annually thanks to Medical debt. They are very caring indeed.
But every now and then someone or something surprises you and that was in this announcement below. The AMA is actually asking their Doctors to do something that well they are supposed to when they become Physicians - actually follow the Hippocratic Oath.
What is next? Actually communicating and listening to a Patient? Well let's not get carried away. One step at a time.
Doctors Warned on ‘Divided Loyalty’
By ROBERT PEAR
Published: December 26, 2012
WASHINGTON — With hospitals buying up medical practices around the country and seeking to make the most of their investment, the American Medical Association reached out to doctors this week to remind them that patient welfare must always come first and not be overridden by the economic interests of hospitals that now employ doctors in ever-growing numbers.
“In any situation where the economic or other interests of the employer are in conflict with patient welfare, patient welfare must take priority,” says a policy statement adopted by the association.
“A physician’s paramount responsibility is to his or her patients,” the association said. At the same time, it added, a doctor “owes a duty of loyalty to his or her employer,” and “this divided loyalty can create conflicts of interest, such as financial incentives to over- or under-treat patients.”
The association is disseminating its policy to doctors at a time when more of them are becoming hospital employees. About one-third of new doctors say they would prefer to be employed by hospitals, rather than practice on their own. The association is urging hospitals and medical groups to adopt similar policies.
A major goal of the guidelines is to protect the professional autonomy of doctors. Hospital employment agreements often include provisions that discourage doctors from sending patients to providers of services that are not affiliated with the hospital.
The guidelines say that “physicians should always make treatment and referral decisions based on the best interests of their patients.” Moreover, the association says, patients should be told whenever a hospital provides financial incentives that encourage, discourage or restrict referrals or treatment options.
“We never want patients to worry or wonder if a decision is being made in their best interest,” said Dr. Ardis Dee Hoven, a Kentucky internist who is president-elect of the association.
From 2000 to 2010, the American Hospital Association says, the number of doctors employed by hospitals grew by 32 percent, to 212,000. The trend has accelerated since then, in part because of federal policies that encourage doctors and hospitals to band together to coordinate care.
In addition, many doctors have found that private practice on their own is no longer profitable and comes with a host of complications, so they are more receptive to the idea of hospital employment.
“Physicians are squeezed between rising costs and decreasing reimbursement,” and they “see only declining revenue in the future,” as Medicare and private insurers restrict payments, the American Medical Association said.
In a report accompanying its principles for physician employment, the association said that doctors have a “fiduciary responsibility” to patients and should have an “unfettered right to exercise independent professional judgment” in caring for and advocating for patients.
Dr. Jerry D. Kennett, a leader of the American College of Cardiology, said he was aware of cases in which a hospital had told doctors not to place defibrillators in Medicaid patients because “it’s a money-losing proposition” for the hospital.
In other cases, he said, hospitals have told doctors they must use the hospital for laboratory work and certain imaging procedures, even if doctors found that they got better results or better service elsewhere.
Richard J. Umbdenstock, the president of the American Hospital Association, said he had no major problem with the medical association’s principles. “Hospitals and doctors have a long history of being on the same page, doing what is best for patients,” he said.
In compensating doctors, hospitals often pay a salary with a bonus that depends on a doctor’s productivity, contributions to the quality of care and patient-satisfaction ratings.
Productivity is typically measured in terms of “relative value units,” which reflect the time, technical skill, physical and mental effort and judgment required to perform a particular service. Federal officials have assigned a relative value to each service for the purpose of paying doctors under Medicare.
“Use of relative value units is a fairly standard measure of performance for physicians” employed by hospitals, the medical association says in a manual describing doctor-hospital contracts.
Hospitals often set a goal for doctors that can result in a bonus, but if the doctors fall short, their salary may be reduced the next year.
Another issue addressed in the guidelines is what happens when a doctor and a hospital part ways.
Hospitals frequently seek agreements to ensure that physician employees will not work for competitors if they leave the hospital staff. Such agreements typically prohibit a doctor from practicing medicine in a certain geographic area for several years after the doctor’s employment ends.
The medical association discouraged doctors from entering into such agreements, and it said that “patients should be given the choice to continue to be seen by the physician in his or her new practice setting.”